|
XCIN Mail-list
|
| Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] | Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next] |
| Subject: | [FWD][I18n] Re: misunderstanding about Xutf8* API |
| From: | Edward Lee <edward.@kimo.com> |
| Organization: | GNU/Linux/*BSD Dreamer Club |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:34:28 +0800 |
| To: | xcin-list <xcin@linux.org.tw> |
| Reply-To: | xcin@linux.org.tw |
| User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.9i (Linux 2.2.18 i586) |
看來好像是誤會一場,已有人出來解釋,以下是綜合起來的 FWD. 奇怪的是,原發信人 Markus 卻沒出來說明清楚。 現在的標題又被改成: "We should use Xutf8* function where necessary" 了!:) 我晚上整理一下,把和 xcin 相關的 post 上來。 希望大家不致看煩了!:) ----- Forwarded-1 message from Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> ----- From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:13:51 +0100 (CET) To: i18n@XFree86.Org Cc: xorg_i18n@x.org, li18nux@li18nux.org, bsd-locale@hauN.org Subject: [I18n] Re: misunderstanding about Xutf8* API T.SHIOZAKI writes: > > I think XFree86 should revoke the Xutf8* functions, > since these essentialy conflict with the XLC/XIM/XOM framework and > it makes essential incompatibility. Not at all. The Xutf8DrawString uses an XFontSet, a.k.a. XOC. The Xutf8LookupString returns input from any XIM input method, properly converted to UTF-8. Where do you see a conflict? Where do you see an incompatibility? Bruno _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list I18n@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n ----- End forwarded-1 message ----- ----- Forwarded-2 message from Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> ----- From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:17:23 +0100 (CET) To: i18n@XFree86.Org Cc: bsd-locale@hauN.org Subject: [I18n] Re: misunderstanding about Xutf8* API immediately T.SHIOZAKI writes: > Before including Xutf8*, the followers of Xutf8* must clear the reason > why needs Xutf8* with paying dearly and why XLC/XOM/XIM is no good. Noone said that XLC/XOM/XIM is no good. But its API has been incomplete. > XLC/XOM/XIM natively allows us mutual coexistence between any legacy > encodings and Unicode Not without ugly calls to setlocale that disagree with the locale the user has set. > but Xutf8* essencially disallows us it. Not true. FreeBSD now also has iconv, and through iconv you can convert from any encoding to UTF-8. > I cannot see any advanced point of Xutf8* which is worth while paying > incompatibility and the labor for the transition. There is no incompatibility. And there is no transition for applications that already use Xmb* and are happy with it. Bruno _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list I18n@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n ----- End forwarded-2 message ----- ----- Forwarded-3 message from Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> ----- From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:14:33 +0100 (CET) To: i18n@XFree86.Org Cc: xorg_i18n@x.org, li18nux@li18nux.org, bsd-locale@hauN.org Subject: [I18n] Re: misunderstanding of Xutf8* API Chester writes: > there are more people that shift > to support XIM/XOM architecture,and the China don't want use unicode > in the future. > That's will confuse them if you change another instead of XIM/XOM > framework. There must be a misunderstanding of what the Xutf8* functions are. They are an application/extension of the XIM/XOM framework. They are in no way contradictory to it. Bruno _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list I18n@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n ----- End forwarded-3 message ----- ----- Forwarded-4 message from Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> ----- From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:12:08 +0100 (CET) To: i18n@XFree86.Org Subject: [I18n] Re: miunderstanding about Xutf8* API Tomohiro KUBOTA writes: > Choice of which encoding to be used should be left for the user. > However strongly we believe that UTF-8 is the ideal encodings and > that we don't need other encodings, users can have different > need and opinion. I entirely agree with you here. > We should not think about abolishing using Xmb*/Xwc* before when > almost applications will supply this choice and almost users will > choose UTF-8. Nobody thinks of abolishing Xmb*/Xwc*. That would be stupid. libXaw uses Xwc*, and many internationalized apps use Xmb*. Bruno _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list I18n@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n ----- End forwarded-4 message ----- -- Warm regards, Edward Lee(李果正) ---------------- 學問深時意氣平。 ---------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@linux.org.tw with "unsubscribe xcin" in the body of the message
| Indexed By Date | Previous: |
Re: [FWD] Re: [I18n] On the Xutf8* funtions and the future of UTF-8 l From: thhsieh@linux.org.tw |
|---|---|---|
| Next: |
Re: [FWD][I18n] Re: misunderstanding about Xutf8* API From: thhsieh@linux.org.tw |
|
| Indexed By Thread | Previous: |
Re: [FWD] Re: [I18n] On the Xutf8* funtions and the future of UTF-8 l From: Platin.bbs@openbazaar.net (小虫) |
| Next: |
Re: [FWD][I18n] Re: misunderstanding about Xutf8* API From: thhsieh@linux.org.tw |