Great Circle Associates

XCIN Mail-list
(December 2000)


Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: [Fwd: XIM application frozen on gtk+1.3.*]
From: moto.bbs@openbazaar.net (小摸...)
Organization: OpenBazaar
Date: 12 Dec 2000 02:29:43 GMT
To: xcin@tlug.sinica.edu.tw
Reply-To: xcin@linux.org.tw

※ 引述《informer@ns1.m2000.idv.tw (informer)》之銘言:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 thhsieh@linux.org.tw wrote:
> > 我之所以會覺得 OnTheSpot 可能比較難寫,是因為此模式下可能要處理 callback,
> > 還要將 server 這邊的組字資訊轉成 protocol 傳送給 client, 而萬一 client
> > 那邊沒有適當地畫出來也是一件頭痛的事。所以,這裡的困難是偏向於 client
> > 與 server 之間的互動問題。
> 我想 owen 的意思是
> To take a rather GTK+-centric view of the world, if GTK+
> does on-the-spot well, and doesn't do over-the-spot input,
>                  ^^^^  => 如果做的好就不用 oevr-the-spot 了
> I think the pressure will be on IM developers to support
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> on-the-spot, not GTK+ to support over-the-spot input.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^ => 這和 mingche 的觀點類似吧,
>                這會使我們要去適應 gtk+ 的 on-the-spot
> 所以為了方便 ( 減少 XIM server and client 的資料傳送 )
> 還是請 gtk 支援 over-the-spot, 讓 XIM server 自己處理組字區吧
> thhsieh/mingche 同意呼 ?

    我也覺得讓Server端來處理會比較好...直覺上Ap的developer就不用
    太多的effort在這上面(像現在這樣)..而且這樣似乎比較統一...




.
--
※ Origin: 網路邊攤BBS <openbazaar.net> 
◆ From: 211.72.164.165
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@linux.org.tw
with "unsubscribe xcin" in the body of the message


Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: [認領注音]8501-9000
From: edward.bbs@openbazaar.net (Edward Lee)
Next: [Fwd: XIM application frozen on gtk+1.3.*]
From: Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@linux.org.tw>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: [Fwd: XIM application frozen on gtk+1.3.*]
From: informer <informer@ns1.m2000.idv.tw>
Next: Re: [Fwd: XIM application frozen on gtk+1.3.*]
From: Isaac Kar-Keung To <kkto@csis.hku.hk>